Greg Stanton

Democrat · AZ-4 · U.S. House

Bio

Gregory John Stanton is an American lawyer and politician who is the U.S. representative from Arizona's 4th congressional district, serving since 2019. A Democrat, he was previously mayor of Phoenix from 2012 to 2018, and was on the Phoenix City Council from 2000 until 2009.

Full bio on Wikipedia →

Record of service

In office: 7.6 years
First took office: 2019 (4 terms)
Seniority: 193 of 437 by time served
Age: 56

District offices

Mesa, AZ · 602-956-2463

FEC filings ↗OpenSecrets ↗GovTrack ↗Ballotpedia ↗Vote Smart ↗Facebook ↗Instagram ↗X/Twitter ↗

Service history, offices and identifiers from unitedstates/congress-legislators (public domain). Years served sum each term rather than subtracting the first start date, so a break in service is not counted as time in office.

Reported net worth

2019

$203k

2020

$501k

2021

$176k

2022

$215k

2023

$477k

2024

$1.0M

2025

$1.5M

Most recent filing (2025)

Assets: $1.4M – $3.3M
Liabilities: $565k – $1.1M
Net worth: $270k – $2.8M
Since 2019: +$1.3M

Largest holdings in the 2025 filing · 29 assets reported

TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP (TCNNF)$250k – $500k

Nationwide 401(a) Plan ⇒ American Funds 2035 Trgt Date Retire T6 RFFTX$250k – $500k

Wells Fargo Accounts$100k – $250k

Equitable Edge 21 Select Variable Annuity ⇒ S&P 500 Std 1Yr - 40% Buff$100k – $250k

Northwestern Mutual IRA ⇒ Aggressive Strategy Fund Class A (RALAX)$100k – $250k

Vanguard 401(k) ⇒ Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX)$100k – $250k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ)$50k – $100k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV)$50k – $100k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL)$50k – $100k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG)$50k – $100k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD)$50k – $100k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG)$50k – $100k

Nationwide 457(b) Plan ⇒ American Funds 2035 Trgt Date Retire T6 RFFTX$50k – $100k

Desert Financial Credit Union$15k – $50k

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV)$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM)$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL)$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ J.P. Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust JPMorgan Active Growt$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL)$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ SPDR Series Trust SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG)$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Vanguard Value ETF (VTV)$15k – $50k

Charles Schwab Roth IRA ⇒ T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF)$15k – $50k

Northwestern Mutual IRA ⇒ Aggressive Strategy Fund Class C (RALCX)$15k – $50k

Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance$1k – $15k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ Charles Schwab Bank Sweep$1k – $15k

Charles Schwab Rollover IRA ⇒ VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT)$1k – $15k

Nationwide 457(b) Plan ⇒ City of Phoenix Stable Income Fund$1k – $15k

Nationwide Post Employment Health Plan ⇒ Nationwide Post Employment Health Plan$1k – $15k

Largest first, capped at 40 line items. Each is the asset's reported value bracket, not the income it produced.

From annual financial disclosures, which report every asset and debt as a bracket — so these are ranges, and the figure shown is their midpoint. A primary residence is not a reportable asset while its mortgage is a reportable debt, which pushes some members negative. How this is calculated →

Overall lean (DW-NOMINATE)

LeftCenterRight

Issue profile

Taxes & Fiscal

D+0.18

Healthcare

D+0.88

Immigration & Border

D+0.44

Guns

D+0.88

Abortion & Reproductive Rights

D+1.00

Environment & Energy

D+0.72

Crime & Policing

D+0.22

Defense & Veterans

D+0.18

Economy & Labor

D+0.37

Foreign Policy & Trade

R+0.02

Civil Rights & Social

D+0.85

Education

D+0.56

Government & Democracy

D+0.65

Judicial & Executive Nominations

R+0.68

Each issue runs left ↔ right, scored from how the member voted on bills tagged to that issue (−1…+1). Issues with too few votes are blank. Overall lean uses DW-NOMINATE.

How they score against the parties

Greg Stanton's voting record compared with each party's national platform, issue by issue — the same similarity score used across the site.

Democratic Party

87%Closest

Green Party

78%

Democratic Socialists (DSA)

74%

Communist Party USA

73%

Libertarian Party

61%

Republican Party

44%

On the political map

Greg Stanton (the large ringed dot) among every current member of Congress and the party platforms.

Party platforms:Communist Party USADemocratic Socialists (DSA)Green PartyDemocratic PartyRepublican PartyLibertarian Party

Each small dot is a current member (Dem · Rep); the larger dots are party platforms — click one for its closest members. Economic axis: taxes, healthcare, labor, energy. Social axis: abortion, guns, immigration, civil rights, crime.

Do you vote like Stanton?

Answer a few questions on the issues and see which members of Congress — and which party — actually line up with you.

Take the 2-minute quiz

Caucuses & committees

Where Stantonsits in Congress's own organization — each group's lean is computed from its members' voting records. Explore them all on the caucuses and committees pages.

Caucuses

New Democrat Coalitionstrongly left · 109 members
Congressional Equality Caucusstrongly left · 153 members

Committees

House Committee on Foreign Affairscenter · 50 members
Western Hemisphere
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructurecenter · 66 members
Aviation Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management (Ranking Member)Highways and Transit
House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Partycenter · 23 members

Most and least aligned members

Treating Stanton's 14 issue scores as a vector, cosine similarity measures whether two voting records point the same way (+100%) or in opposite directions (−100%) — the colleagues whose records align most and least with theirs.